Practical answer
Can my AI song be taken down for copyright?
Primary evidence: TIDAL ↗ · Spotify ↗
Which takedown paths bite most often?
Impersonation (policy, not court). The fastest and most common removal for AI music: a recognizable cloned voice triggers platform impersonation rules. No DMCA notice needed — DSPs act on their own policies, and rights holders know it.
Copyright claims on the underlying material. If your track contains an unlicensed sample, interpolation, or a cover without its mechanical license, standard DMCA notice-and-takedown applies exactly as it does to human-made music. AI provenance is irrelevant to this analysis.
Fraud linkage. Tracks connected to artificial streaming get removed and forfeit royalties across platforms; AI-generated catalogs uploaded at scale are the primary current target of these sweeps.
Content-ID style matching. Automated matching can flag AI output that closely resembles existing recordings. Whether a generated track that sounds like a copyrighted song without copying it infringes anything is one of the genuinely unresolved questions — no US court has ruled on it for AI music.
What should you do if it happens to you?
Takedowns are allegations. Counter-notice procedures exist on every major platform, and mistaken AI-detection flags are a documented phenomenon — detector accuracy claims lack public validation (see the detectors answer). Keep your creation evidence: project files, prompt history and drafts are what distinguishes your human contribution when it's questioned.
Original sources
Structured information, not legal advice.