Do I have to label my music as AI-generated?

LAST VERIFIED 15 Jul 2026

No US law requires it as of July 2026 — but platforms increasingly do. TIDAL labels wholly AI-generated tracks itself and removes them from royalty attribution, and the industry announced voluntary "AI-Generated" / "AI-Assisted" labels in July 2026. Contest and distributor rules often require disclosure regardless.

The three layers of "have to"

Law: no general federal or state statute currently mandates labeling AI-generated music for the public. Disclosure obligations appear in narrower contexts (political ads, some state laws) — not for releasing a track.

Platforms: TIDAL's AI policy took effect July 15, 2026: the platform itself labels music it determines to be wholly AI-generated, and such tracks become ineligible for royalty attribution. Other DSPs have varying policies; several rely on distributor-supplied metadata.

Industry standard (voluntary): on July 10, 2026, IFPI, RIAA, A2IM, WIN, IMPALA, the Recording Academy, SAG-AFTRA and the Human Artistry Campaign announced two voluntary track-level labels — AI-Generated and AI-Assisted. The labels are announced but not yet implemented, and how they travel through the distribution pipeline is unspecified.

The practical read: even where nothing forces you, undisclosed AI use is increasingly treated as a trust violation by contests (many require disclosure in their rules — check each opportunity's record), platforms, and audiences. Disclosure costs little; being caught not disclosing costs more.

Records cited

rights policy itemMusic Community Voluntary AI Sound Recording Labels
rights policy itemTIDAL AI Policy

Primary sources

Related questions

Structured information, not legal advice.

Something changed? Report a correction →