Rights & Policy

生成AIと著作権の問題に関するJASRACの基本的な考え方

JASRAC policy position calling for respect for creators and critical review of broad uncompensated commercial training under Article 30-4.

AIを利用した作品の取り扱い（ガイドライン）

Current JASRAC registration and administration rule distinguishing human creative contribution from wholly autonomous AI output.

Musik als Lebensnerv

German-speaking music councils jointly framed AI as a tool that must remain under human creative responsibility and called for cultural and legal safeguards.

Independent artists allege Suno infringed their sound recordings in training and outputs.

Coalition statement calling for copyright enforcement, AI training-record transparency and labeling of wholly AI-generated content.

Жасанды интеллект туралы Қазақстан Республикасының Заңы

Kazakhstan's AI law regulates synthetic-content labelling, human creative contribution, prompt protection and machine-readable rights reservations relevant to music and audio AI.

Koda guidance distinguishing fully AI-generated material from registrable human-authored music made with AI assistance.

Forbehold for tekst- og datamining til brug i AI

Koda expressly reserves TDM rights for represented works and requires permission where law does not provide otherwise.

Koda sagsøger Suno

Koda announced a copyright action alleging that Suno used and reproduced Danish songs without permission or payment; no merits ruling is claimed.

Musician plaintiffs allege Google's music-generation systems were trained on protected recordings without authorization.

AI 활용 저작물 등록 유보 제도

Reported KOMCA policy deferring registration of works involving AI from March 2025.

한국음악저작권협회 AI 활용 음악저작물 신고·등록 기준

KOMCA reportedly accepts collective-management registration only where human creative contribution exists and may hold royalties, delete works, discipline members, or recover payments for falsely registered wholly AI-generated output.

공공누리 AI유형

Public-sector licensing label permitting designated public works to be used for AI training under similarity-prevention, source-attribution, and no-resale-of-training-data conditions.

USO DE INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL

Rule allowing works with material AI elements only where relevant human authorship is meaningful and more than minimal, while excluding AI authors from nomination or awards.

Pending reference concerning copyright implications of LLM inputs and outputs and text-and-data-mining rules.

Loi du 1er avril 2022 portant modification de la loi modifiée du 18 avril 2001 sur les droits d'auteur, les droits voisins et les bases de données

Luxembourg's 2022 DSM implementation introduced scientific-research and general TDM exceptions, with rights-reservation conditions relevant to AI training on music and audio material.