Rights & Policy

Toda criação tem dono. Quem usa, paga

Public advocacy campaign by UBC and Pró-Música Brasil for authorization, transparency and payment in AI use of creative works.

Directs federal review and challenge of certain state AI laws and seeks a national policy framework; it does not itself erase state statutes.

생성형 인공지능의 저작물 학습에 대한 저작권법상 공정이용 안내서

Official guide applying Korea's four-factor fair-use framework to protected works, neighboring-rights material, and databases used for generative-AI training, including music and audio.

Certifies generative-AI products or models whose training data meets consent, open-license, public-domain, or ownership criteria plus diligence and recordkeeping.

AIによる著作物利用に関するFCAの見解

Creator and rights-holder coalition position criticizing uncompensated AI training uses and requesting stronger protection and policy discussion.

FIMI report position calling for copyright control, transparency and effective application of EU AI rules to generative music.

Laki eräiden tekoälyjärjestelmien valvonnasta 1377/2025

Finnish law gives national authorities powers to supervise the EU AI Act; most content-transparency duties remained future-dated.

Laki tekijänoikeuslain muuttamisesta 263/2023, 13 b §

Finnish law permits lawful-access TDM unless expressly and appropriately reserved, with a non-waivable scientific-research exception.

Ivors Academy principles covering consent, transparency, remuneration, attribution and creator choice.

音声AI問題の関連団体からの要望書

Four performer and certification organizations asked government to clarify voice publicity protection, use AI Act mechanisms, and study hard-law reform.

인공지능 발전과 신뢰 기반 조성 등에 관한 기본법

Korea's AI Basic Act requires notice for generative-AI services and labeling of generated outputs, with a special perceptibility rule for realistic synthetic sound, images, and video.

Proposition de loi visant à encadrer l’intelligence artificielle par le droit d’auteur

2023 private member's bill proposing authorization, collective management, AI-generated labeling, and a levy where source identification is impossible.

Proposition de loi relative à l’instauration d’une présomption d’utilisation des contenus culturels par les fournisseurs d’intelligence artificielle

Bill creating a rebuttable civil presumption of use where evidence about a model, system, deployment, or output makes protected-content use plausible.

Concertation entre les développeurs de modèles d’IA générative et les ayants droit culturels

Government-facilitated talks launched in June 2025; a later Senate update states that the process ended without a shared solution on value sharing.

Article L122-5-3 du Code de la propriété intellectuelle

Defines scientific-research and general text-and-data-mining exceptions, with lawful-access, security, retention, and rights-reservation conditions.

La stratégie du ministère pour des intelligences artificielles culturelles et responsables

National culture-ministry strategy linking cultural AI investment to creator rights, fair remuneration, sovereign infrastructure, jobs, and information integrity.