AI-Related Music Organization Council Opinion on Generative AI and Copyright
生成AIと著作権に関するAIに関する音楽団体協議会の意見
rights policy item·industry position·active
Council submission reiterating opposition to uncompensated commercial training and requesting effective rights protection and lawful use frameworks.
Verified facts
| Official site | https://www.riaj.or.jp/news/update/20251217/ ↗ |
|---|---|
| Geography | Japan |
| parties | unknown |
| item type | industry coalition opinion |
| identifier | Opinion of 17 December 2025 |
| filing date | unknown |
| jurisdiction | Japan |
| adoption date | unknown |
| effective date | unknown |
| canonical title | AI-Related Music Organization Council Opinion on Generative AI and Copyright |
| enforcement date | unknown |
| issuing authority | AI-Related Music Organization Council |
| primary documents | https://www.riaj.or.jp/news/update/20251217/ |
| unresolved questions | Government response, any licensing mechanism, and treatment under the draft principles code. |
| affected entity types | music-sector coalition; copyright advocacy |
| documented interpretations | unknown |
| affected professional workflows | policy advocacy; training-data licensing; creator remuneration |
| current procedural legal status | Current party submission; no binding effect. |
| amendments appeals superseding items | unknown |
| obligations permissions restrictions | States coalition claims and requested reforms; it is advocacy and not an official interpretation of Article 30-4. |
| affected organizations models datasets works | music creators; performers; labels; publishers; AI developers |
Sources & changes
4d ago · mediumhow verification works
Structured information, not legal advice.
Is this yours? Claim this record →·See something wrong? Report a correction →
