Spitz Park v ECAD AI-music royalty interlocutory appeal
Agravo de Instrumento nº 5032376-37.2025.8.24.0000/SC
rights policy item·court case·unknown
Interlocutory decision declining to suspend ECAD collection while an AI-music public-performance dispute proceeds.
Verified facts
| Official site | https://www2.camara.leg.br/atividade-legislativa/comissoes/comissoes-temporarias/especiais/57a-legislatura/comissao-especial-sobre-inteligencia-artificial-pl-2338-23/expedientes-recebidos/copy_of_DecisodoTribunaldeJustiadeSCECADexecuopblicademsicafeitacomIA.pdf ↗ |
|---|---|
| Geography | Brazil |
| identifier | 5032376-37.2025.8.24.0000/SC |
| parties | org_br_spitz_park; org_br_ecad |
| item type | court_case |
| identifier | 5032376-37.2025.8.24.0000/SC |
| filing date | 2025-06-27 |
| jurisdiction | Santa Catarina, Brazil |
| adoption date | 2025-07-31 |
| affected works | tracks generated or arranged using Suno and publicly performed at the venue |
| current status | Interlocutory appeal denied; underlying action 5028302-65.2025.8.24.0023 remained pending in the reviewed record. |
| effective date | 2025-07-31 |
| affected models | tool_suno |
| canonical title | Spitz Park v ECAD AI-music royalty interlocutory appeal |
| enforcement date | unknown |
| affected datasets | unknown |
| issuing authority | Court of Justice of Santa Catarina |
| primary documents | https://www2.camara.leg.br/atividade-legislativa/comissoes/comissoes-temporarias/especiais/57a-legislatura/comissao-especial-sobre-inteligencia-artificial-pl-2338-23/expedientes-recebidos/copy_of_DecisodoTribunaldeJustiadeSCECADexecuopblicademsicafeitacomIA.pdf |
| unresolved questions | Merits outcome, finality, provenance of each track and ultimate distribution of collected royalties were not resolved. |
| affected entity types | music users; collective-management organizations; AI-music tool users |
| affected organizations | org_br_spitz_park; org_br_ecad |
| documented interpretations | ABRAMUS characterized the decision as recognizing collection for AI music; that characterization is a party interpretation broader than the procedural holding. |
| affected professional workflows | public-performance licensing; venue music programming; collective royalty collection |
Current
| applies | Brazilian Copyright and Neighboring Rights Act |
|---|---|
| plaintiff in (by) | Spitz Park Aventuras |
| defendant in (by) | Escritório Central de Arrecadação e Distribuição |
| concerns | Suno |
Sources & changes
checked 6d ago · highhow verification works
entity_typeofficial source ↗
subtypeofficial source ↗
canonical_nameofficial source ↗
slug_candidateofficial source ↗
original_namesofficial source ↗
statusofficial source ↗
short_descriptionofficial source ↗
official_urlofficial source ↗
primary_geographyofficial source ↗
datesofficial source ↗
external_idsofficial source ↗
attributes.item_typeofficial source ↗
attributes.canonical_titleofficial source ↗
attributes.jurisdictionofficial source ↗
attributes.issuing_authorityofficial source ↗
attributes.identifierofficial source ↗
attributes.partiesofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_entity_typesofficial source ↗
attributes.filing_dateofficial source ↗
attributes.adoption_dateofficial source ↗
attributes.effective_dateofficial source ↗
attributes.current_statusofficial source ↗
attributes.obligations_permissions_restrictionsofficial source ↗
attributes.primary_documentsofficial source ↗
attributes.amendments_appeals_superseding_itemsofficial source ↗
attributes.documented_interpretationsofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_organizationsofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_modelsofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_worksofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_professional_workflowsofficial source ↗
attributes.unresolved_questionsofficial source ↗
recordofficial source ↗
recordofficial source ↗
dates.filed_atofficial source ↗
dates.adopted_atofficial source ↗
dates.effective_atofficial source ↗
Structured information, not legal advice.
Is this yours? Claim this record →·See something wrong? Report a correction →
