Draft initiative bill on control over deepfakes

Initiatiefwetsvoorstel Zeggenschap over deepfakes

rights policy item·draft legislation·closed

A closed public-consultation draft proposed a neighboring right allowing natural persons, artists, and specified successors to authorize or prohibit defined deepfakes of voice or appearance; it was not law at the snapshot date.

Verified facts

Official sitehttps://www.internetconsultatie.nl/zeggenschapoverdeepfakes/b1
GeographyNetherlands
partiesproposed right holders; deepfake makers and distributors; online intermediaries
item typedraft_legislation
filing date2025-10-30
jurisdictionNetherlands
adoption dateunknown
affected worksvoice; likeness; performances; synthetic audiovisual and audio output
effective dateunknown
affected modelsunknown
canonical titleInitiatiefwetsvoorstel Zeggenschap over deepfakes
enforcement dateunknown
affected datasetsunknown
issuing authorityInitiating member of the House of Representatives; public consultation hosted by the Government of the Netherlands
primary documentshttps://www.internetconsultatie.nl/zeggenschapoverdeepfakes/b1; https://www.internetconsultatie.nl/zeggenschapoverdeepfakes/document/14831; https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/ah-tk-20252026-1351.html
affected entity typesnatural persons; performers; artists; heirs; AI developers; platforms; media producers
affected organizationsunknown
documented interpretationsunknown
affected professional workflowsvoice cloning; deepfake production; platform distribution; artist authorization
current procedural legal statuspublic consultation closed; draft not introduced in Parliament as of the latest official posture source reviewed
amendments appeals superseding itemsunknown
obligations permissions restrictionsThe consultation draft proposed a right to authorize or prohibit making, using, and distributing deepfakes of a person's voice or appearance.; The proposal covered every natural person, with artist-specific provisions and specified post-mortem successor interests.; Exceptions and limitations were proposed; the exact balance would depend on legislative text and any amendments.; The proposal has no binding effect unless introduced and enacted.

Sources & changes

canonical_nameofficial source ↗
original_namesofficial source ↗
short_descriptionofficial source ↗
primary_geographyofficial source ↗
attributes.item_typeofficial source ↗
attributes.canonical_titleofficial source ↗
attributes.jurisdictionofficial source ↗
attributes.issuing_authorityofficial source ↗
attributes.partiesofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_entity_typesofficial source ↗
attributes.filing_dateofficial source ↗
attributes.current_procedural_legal_statusofficial source ↗
attributes.obligations_permissions_restrictionsofficial source ↗
attributes.primary_documentsofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_worksofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_professional_workflowsofficial source ↗
attributes.unresolved_legal_or_factual_questionsofficial source ↗
attributes.obligations_permissions_restrictionsofficial source ↗
attributes.current_procedural_legal_statusofficial source ↗

Structured information, not legal advice.

Is this yours? Claim this record →·See something wrong? Report a correction →