Draft initiative bill on control over deepfakes
Initiatiefwetsvoorstel Zeggenschap over deepfakes
rights policy item·draft legislation·closed
A closed public-consultation draft proposed a neighboring right allowing natural persons, artists, and specified successors to authorize or prohibit defined deepfakes of voice or appearance; it was not law at the snapshot date.
Verified facts
| Official site | https://www.internetconsultatie.nl/zeggenschapoverdeepfakes/b1 ↗ |
|---|---|
| Geography | Netherlands |
| parties | proposed right holders; deepfake makers and distributors; online intermediaries |
| item type | draft_legislation |
| filing date | 2025-10-30 |
| jurisdiction | Netherlands |
| adoption date | unknown |
| affected works | voice; likeness; performances; synthetic audiovisual and audio output |
| effective date | unknown |
| affected models | unknown |
| canonical title | Initiatiefwetsvoorstel Zeggenschap over deepfakes |
| enforcement date | unknown |
| affected datasets | unknown |
| issuing authority | Initiating member of the House of Representatives; public consultation hosted by the Government of the Netherlands |
| primary documents | https://www.internetconsultatie.nl/zeggenschapoverdeepfakes/b1; https://www.internetconsultatie.nl/zeggenschapoverdeepfakes/document/14831; https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/ah-tk-20252026-1351.html |
| affected entity types | natural persons; performers; artists; heirs; AI developers; platforms; media producers |
| affected organizations | unknown |
| documented interpretations | unknown |
| affected professional workflows | voice cloning; deepfake production; platform distribution; artist authorization |
| current procedural legal status | public consultation closed; draft not introduced in Parliament as of the latest official posture source reviewed |
| amendments appeals superseding items | unknown |
| obligations permissions restrictions | The consultation draft proposed a right to authorize or prohibit making, using, and distributing deepfakes of a person's voice or appearance.; The proposal covered every natural person, with artist-specific provisions and specified post-mortem successor interests.; Exceptions and limitations were proposed; the exact balance would depend on legislative text and any amendments.; The proposal has no binding effect unless introduced and enacted. |
Sources & changes
4d ago · highhow verification works
subtypeofficial source ↗
canonical_nameofficial source ↗
original_namesofficial source ↗
statusofficial source ↗
short_descriptionofficial source ↗
official_urlofficial source ↗
primary_geographyofficial source ↗
datesofficial source ↗
attributes.item_typeofficial source ↗
attributes.canonical_titleofficial source ↗
attributes.jurisdictionofficial source ↗
attributes.issuing_authorityofficial source ↗
attributes.partiesofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_entity_typesofficial source ↗
attributes.filing_dateofficial source ↗
attributes.current_procedural_legal_statusofficial source ↗
attributes.obligations_permissions_restrictionsofficial source ↗
attributes.primary_documentsofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_worksofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_professional_workflowsofficial source ↗
attributes.unresolved_legal_or_factual_questionsofficial source ↗
attributes.obligations_permissions_restrictionsofficial source ↗
attributes.current_procedural_legal_statusofficial source ↗
Structured information, not legal advice.
Is this yours? Claim this record →·See something wrong? Report a correction →
