Publicity Rights Protection Council
퍼블리시티권 보호 협의체
rights policy item·enforcement coordination·active
Government-industry council with five major Korean entertainment companies to share publicity-right infringement cases, connect investigations and enforcement, improve corrective orders, and develop responses to AI-enabled misuse.
Verified facts
| Official site | https://www.kipo.go.kr/ko/kpoBultnDetail.do?aprchId=BUT0000029&keyword=&menuCd=SCD0200618&ntatcSeq=20949&pageIndex=&searchCondition=&sysCd=SCD02 ↗ |
|---|---|
| Geography | South Korea |
| parties | Ministry of Intellectual Property; CJ ENM; HYBE; JYP Entertainment; SM Entertainment; YG Entertainment |
| item type | public-private enforcement council |
| confidence | high |
| identifier | Publicity Rights Protection Council |
| filing date | unknown |
| jurisdiction | South Korea |
| adoption date | unknown |
| effective date | unknown |
| canonical title | Publicity Rights Protection Council |
| confidence basis | Primary official source verified. |
| enforcement date | unknown |
| issuing authority | Ministry of Intellectual Property |
| primary documents | https://www.kipo.go.kr/ko/kpoBultnDetail.do?aprchId=BUT0000029&keyword=&menuCd=SCD0200618&ntatcSeq=20949&pageIndex=&searchCondition=&sysCd=SCD02 |
| unresolved questions | Operating protocol, case outcomes, voice-specific scope, and public reporting cadence were not yet published. |
| affected entity types | CJ ENM; HYBE; JYP Entertainment; SM Entertainment; YG Entertainment; artists; voice and likeness misuse |
| documented interpretations | unknown |
| affected professional workflows | infringement reporting; administrative investigation; enforcement referral; corrective orders; AI policy reform |
| current procedural legal status | Active coordination body; no adjudicative authority or independent binding rules identified. |
| amendments appeals superseding items | unknown |
| obligations permissions restrictions | Plans recurring case sharing, rapid confirmation of infringement information, linkage to administrative investigation and enforcement, stronger corrective measures, and policy reform for AI-enabled violations. |
Sources & changes
4d ago · highhow verification works
entity_typeofficial source ↗
subtypeofficial source ↗
canonical_nameofficial source ↗
original_namesofficial source ↗
statusofficial source ↗
short_descriptionofficial source ↗
official_urlofficial source ↗
primary_geographyofficial source ↗
datesofficial source ↗
attributes.item_typeofficial source ↗
attributes.canonical_titleofficial source ↗
attributes.jurisdictionofficial source ↗
attributes.issuing_authorityofficial source ↗
attributes.identifierofficial source ↗
attributes.partiesofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_entity_typesofficial source ↗
attributes.current_procedural_legal_statusofficial source ↗
attributes.obligations_permissions_restrictionsofficial source ↗
attributes.primary_documentsofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_organizations_models_datasets_worksofficial source ↗
attributes.affected_professional_workflowsofficial source ↗
attributes.unresolved_questionsofficial source ↗
attributes.confidenceofficial source ↗
attributes.confidence_basisofficial source ↗
recordofficial source ↗
Structured information, not legal advice.
Is this yours? Claim this record →·See something wrong? Report a correction →
