Le SMA, 20 ans plus tard

publication·limited podcast series·active

SMA-owned multi-episode podcast reviewing the union’s history and current issues, with a 2025 episode tied to AI and music-sector change.

Verified facts

Official sitehttps://www.sma-syndicat.org/le-podcast-des-20-ans-du-sma/
GeographyFrance
typelimited podcast series
topicsmusic-sector history; labor; independence; AI and creation
cadencesix-episode anniversary series; recurrence not announced
languagesfr-FR
launch date2025
activity stateactive_archive
owner operatorSyndicat des Musiques Actuelles
current activitySix episodes were published for the SMA’s twentieth anniversary; episode 6 frames AI as a major sector issue.
intended audiencemusic professionals; SMA members; policy audiences
online offline stateonline audio
business access modelfree streaming
latest evidence of activitydate: 2025-09 · title: Episode 6 — Et dans 20 ans ?
editorial or governance leadershippublisher: SMA
sponsorship editorial independenceorganization-owned media
public membership or subscriber sizeunknown

Sources & changes

/canonical_nameofficial source ↗
/original_namesofficial source ↗
/official_urlofficial source ↗
/primary_geographyofficial source ↗
/short_descriptionofficial source ↗
/attributes/latest_evidence_of_activityofficial source ↗
/attributes/owner_operatorofficial source ↗
/attributes/typeofficial source ↗
/attributes/topicsofficial source ↗
/attributes/intended_audienceofficial source ↗
/attributes/languagesofficial source ↗
/attributes/online_offline_stateofficial source ↗
/attributes/launch_dateofficial source ↗
/attributes/current_activityofficial source ↗
/attributes/cadenceofficial source ↗
PARTY CLAIM/attributes/public_membership_or_subscriber_sizeofficial source ↗
/attributes/editorial_or_governance_leadershipofficial source ↗
/attributes/business_access_modelofficial source ↗
/attributes/activity_stateofficial source ↗
PARTY CLAIM/attributes/sponsorship_editorial_independenceofficial source ↗

Is this yours? Claim this record →·See something wrong? Report a correction →